Skip to main content

CodeCodePrism MCP Server - Current Implementation Description

Overviewโ€‹

CodeCodePrism provides a graph-first code intelligence MCP server that enables LLM applications to understand and navigate codebases through structured relationships rather than traditional text-based search. The CodeCodePrism MCP server offers comprehensive repository analysis, code quality metrics, complexity analysis, and intelligent code traversal capabilities through the standardized Model Context Protocol.

Key Features โญโ€‹

  • 18 Production-Ready MCP Tools including complexity analysis, flow tracing, and architectural pattern analysis
  • Quality Metrics Dashboard with technical debt assessment
  • Context-Enhanced Responses with source code snippets
  • Multi-Language Support (Python, JavaScript/TypeScript)
  • Architectural Intelligence with pattern detection
  • Semantic Parameter Support - Use human-readable names instead of cryptic IDs
  • Environment Variable Integration - Automatic repository detection

Current Capabilities โœ…โ€‹

  • 100% Tool Success Rate - All 18 tools are production-ready with no failures
  • Advanced Python Analysis - Inheritance tracing and decorator analysis
  • Workflow Orchestration - Batch processing and intelligent guidance
  • Full MCP Compliance - Complete protocol implementation
  • Semantic APIs - User-friendly parameter names and clear error messages

Architecture Integrationโ€‹

MCP Complianceโ€‹

CodeCodePrism's MCP server implements the complete MCP specification with support for:

  • โœ… Resources: Repository files, code symbols, and graph data
  • โœ… Tools: Code analysis, path tracing, and graph traversal functions
  • โœ… Prompts: Code analysis templates and workflow guidance
  • โŒ Sampling: Not implemented (focusing on deterministic code analysis)

Server Configurationโ€‹

{
"name": "codeprism-mcp-server",
"version": "0.1.0",
"capabilities": {
"resources": {
"subscribe": true,
"listChanged": true
},
"tools": {
"listChanged": true
},
"prompts": {
"listChanged": false
}
}
}

Core Functionalityโ€‹

1. Repository Scanning and Indexingโ€‹

Initial Repository Analysisโ€‹

When pointed to a codebase, CodeCodePrism performs comprehensive analysis:

Languages Supported:

  • โœ… JavaScript/TypeScript: Complete ES6+ and TSX support with Tree-sitter parsing
  • โœ… Python: Full Python 3.x with comprehensive AST mapping
  • ๐Ÿšง Rust: Parser framework ready (planned for future release)
  • ๐Ÿšง Java: Parser framework ready (planned for future release)
  • ๐Ÿ”„ Additional languages: Via extensible parser architecture

Scanning Process:

  1. Directory Traversal: Recursive scanning with configurable ignore patterns
  2. Language Detection: Automatic file type identification and parser selection
  3. Parallel Processing: Concurrent parsing of multiple files for performance
  4. Graph Construction: Real-time building of code relationship graph
  5. Progress Reporting: Live updates during bulk indexing operations

2. Graph-First Code Intelligenceโ€‹

Universal AST Representationโ€‹

CodeCodePrism maintains a language-agnostic graph structure where each node represents a code symbol (function, class, variable, module) and edges represent relationships (calls, imports, reads, writes).

MCP Resources Implementationโ€‹

Available Resourcesโ€‹

The following resources are currently implemented and available:

Repository Resourcesโ€‹

  • codeprism://repository/ - Repository root information
  • codeprism://repository/stats - Repository statistics and metrics
  • codeprism://repository/config - Repository configuration and settings
  • codeprism://repository/tree - Complete file tree structure
  • codeprism://repository/file/{path} - Individual file content with analysis

Graph Resourcesโ€‹

  • codeprism://graph/repository - Graph structure and statistics

Symbol Resourcesโ€‹

  • codeprism://symbols/functions - All function symbols in the repository
  • codeprism://symbols/classes - All class symbols in the repository
  • codeprism://symbols/variables - All variable symbols in the repository
  • codeprism://symbols/modules - All module symbols in the repository

Quality Metrics Resources โญโ€‹

  • codeprism://metrics/quality_dashboard - Code quality metrics, complexity analysis, and technical debt assessment

Architectural Resources โญ NEWโ€‹

  • codeprism://architecture/layers - Architectural layer structure identification
  • codeprism://architecture/patterns - Detected design patterns and structures
  • codeprism://architecture/dependencies - High-level dependency analysis

Resource Examplesโ€‹

Repository Statistics Resourceโ€‹

Request:

GET /resources/read?uri=codeprism://repository/stats

Response:

{
"contents": [{
"uri": "codeprism://repository/stats",
"mimeType": "application/json",
"text": {
"total_repositories": 1,
"total_files": 156,
"total_nodes": 1250,
"total_edges": 3840
}
}]
}

Functions Resourceโ€‹

Request:

GET /resources/read?uri=codeprism://symbols/functions

Response:

{
"contents": [{
"uri": "codeprism://symbols/functions",
"mimeType": "application/json",
"text": [
{
"id": "a1b2c3d4e5f67890",
"name": "process_data",
"file": "src/main.py",
"span": {
"start_line": 15,
"end_line": 25,
"start_column": 0,
"end_column": 4
},
"signature": "def process_data(input: Dict[str, Any]) -> List[str]",
"language": "Python"
}
]
}]
}

Graph Repository Resourceโ€‹

Request:

GET /resources/read?uri=codeprism://graph/repository

Response:

{
"contents": [{
"uri": "codeprism://graph/repository",
"mimeType": "application/json",
"text": {
"nodes": 1250,
"edges": 3840,
"files": 156,
"nodes_by_kind": {
"Function": 450,
"Class": 120,
"Variable": 580,
"Module": 100
},
"last_updated": 1705234800
}
}]
}

Quality Dashboard Resourceโ€‹

Request:

GET /resources/read?uri=codeprism://metrics/quality_dashboard

Response:

{
"contents": [{
"uri": "codeprism://metrics/quality_dashboard",
"mimeType": "application/json",
"text": {
"repository_overview": {
"total_files": 156,
"total_nodes": 1250,
"total_edges": 3840
},
"code_structure": {
"functions": 450,
"classes": 120,
"modules": 100,
"variables": 580
},
"quality_scores": {
"overall_quality": 75.5,
"maintainability": 68.2,
"readability": 82.3,
"complexity_score": 71.8
},
"technical_debt": {
"high_complexity_functions": 3,
"duplicate_code_blocks": 2,
"large_functions": 5,
"estimated_refactoring_hours": 12.5
},
"recommendations": [
"Refactor high-complexity functions",
"Eliminate duplicate code blocks",
"Add unit tests for critical functions",
"Improve documentation coverage"
]
}
}]
}

MCP Tools Implementationโ€‹

Available Toolsโ€‹

The following 18 tools are currently implemented and fully functional:

Core Navigation & Understanding (4 tools) โœ…โ€‹

  1. repository_stats - Get comprehensive statistics about the repository
  2. explain_symbol - Provide detailed explanation of a code symbol with context (accepts semantic names)
  3. trace_path - Find execution paths between two code symbols
  4. find_dependencies - Analyze dependencies for a code symbol or file

Search & Discovery (4 tools) โœ…โ€‹

  1. search_symbols - Search for symbols by name pattern (with regex support)
  2. search_content - Search across all content including documentation and comments
  3. find_files - Find files by name or path pattern
  4. content_stats - Get statistics about indexed content

Analysis Tools (6 tools) โœ…โ€‹

  1. analyze_complexity - Calculate complexity metrics (cyclomatic, maintainability index)
  2. trace_data_flow - Track data flow through the codebase (forward/backward analysis)
  3. analyze_transitive_dependencies - Analyze complete dependency chains and detect cycles
  4. detect_patterns - Identify design patterns and architectural structures
  5. trace_inheritance - Python inheritance hierarchy analysis with MRO and metaclass support
  6. analyze_decorators - Comprehensive Python decorator analysis with framework detection

Workflow & Orchestration (4 tools) โœ…โ€‹

  1. suggest_analysis_workflow - Get intelligent analysis recommendations for specific goals
  2. batch_analysis - Execute multiple analysis tools in parallel with result aggregation
  3. optimize_workflow - Optimize analysis workflows based on usage patterns
  4. find_references - Find all references to a symbol across the codebase

Resource Examplesโ€‹

Repository Statistics Resourceโ€‹

Request:

GET /resources/read?uri=codeprism://repository/stats

Response:

{
"contents": [{
"uri": "codeprism://repository/stats",
"mimeType": "application/json",
"text": {
"repository_path": "/path/to/repository",
"total_files": 156,
"total_nodes": 1250,
"total_edges": 3840,
"nodes_by_kind": {
"Function": 450,
"Class": 120,
"Variable": 580,
"Module": 100
},
"status": "active"
}
}]
}

Functions Resourceโ€‹

Request:

GET /resources/read?uri=codeprism://symbols/functions

Response:

{
"contents": [{
"uri": "codeprism://symbols/functions",
"mimeType": "application/json",
"text": [
{
"id": "a1b2c3d4e5f67890",
"name": "process_data",
"file": "src/main.py",
"span": {
"start_line": 15,
"end_line": 25,
"start_column": 0,
"end_column": 4
},
"signature": "def process_data(input: Dict[str, Any]) -> List[str]",
"language": "Python"
}
]
}]
}

Graph Repository Resourceโ€‹

Request:

GET /resources/read?uri=codeprism://graph/repository

Response:

{
"contents": [{
"uri": "codeprism://graph/repository",
"mimeType": "application/json",
"text": {
"nodes": 1250,
"edges": 3840,
"files": 156,
"nodes_by_kind": {
"Function": 450,
"Class": 120,
"Variable": 580,
"Module": 100
},
"last_updated": 1705234800
}
}]
}

Quality Dashboard Resourceโ€‹

Request:

GET /resources/read?uri=codeprism://metrics/quality_dashboard

Response:

{
"contents": [{
"uri": "codeprism://metrics/quality_dashboard",
"mimeType": "application/json",
"text": {
"repository_overview": {
"total_files": 156,
"total_nodes": 1250,
"total_edges": 3840
},
"code_structure": {
"functions": 450,
"classes": 120,
"modules": 100,
"variables": 580
},
"quality_scores": {
"overall_quality": 75.5,
"maintainability": 68.2,
"readability": 82.3,
"complexity_score": 71.8
},
"technical_debt": {
"high_complexity_functions": 3,
"duplicate_code_blocks": 2,
"large_functions": 5,
"estimated_refactoring_hours": 12.5
},
"recommendations": [
"Refactor high-complexity functions",
"Eliminate duplicate code blocks",
"Add unit tests for critical functions",
"Improve documentation coverage"
]
}
}]
}

MCP Prompts Implementationโ€‹

Available Promptsโ€‹

The following prompts are currently implemented:

1. Repository Overview Promptโ€‹

Name: repository_overview Description: Generate a comprehensive overview of the repository structure and contents

Arguments:

  • focus_area (optional): Area to focus on (architecture, dependencies, entry_points, etc.)

Example Usage:

{
"method": "prompts/get",
"params": {
"name": "repository_overview",
"arguments": {
"focus_area": "architecture"
}
}
}

Example Response:

{
"description": "Repository overview and analysis prompt",
"messages": [
{
"role": "user",
"content": {
"type": "text",
"text": "Please provide a comprehensive overview of this repository with the following context:\n\nRepository: /path/to/repository\nTotal files: 156\nFocus area: architecture\n\nPlease analyze and provide:\n1. Repository structure and organization\n2. Main technologies and frameworks used\n3. Key entry points and important files\n4. Dependencies and external libraries\n5. Code patterns and architectural decisions\n6. Areas for potential improvement\n\nFocus particularly on: architecture\n\nUse the repository resources and tools available to gather detailed information about the codebase."
}
}
]
}

2. Code Analysis Promptโ€‹

Name: code_analysis Description: Analyze code quality, patterns, and potential improvements

Arguments:

  • file_pattern (optional): File pattern to focus analysis on
  • analysis_type (optional): Type of analysis (quality, security, performance, architecture)

Example Usage:

{
"method": "prompts/get",
"params": {
"name": "code_analysis",
"arguments": {
"file_pattern": "*.py",
"analysis_type": "quality"
}
}
}

3. Debug Assistance Promptโ€‹

Name: debug_assistance Description: Help debug issues in the codebase with contextual information

Arguments:

  • issue_description (required): Description of the issue or error
  • affected_files (optional): Files related to the issue

Example Usage:

{
"method": "prompts/get",
"params": {
"name": "debug_assistance",
"arguments": {
"issue_description": "Function returning None instead of expected string",
"affected_files": "src/main.py, src/utils.py"
}
}
}

4. Debug Issue Promptโ€‹

Name: debug_issue Description: Analyze potential bug sources and dependencies for debugging

Arguments:

  • error_location (required): File and line where error occurs
  • error_message (optional): Error message or description

Example Usage:

{
"method": "prompts/get",
"params": {
"name": "debug_issue",
"arguments": {
"error_location": "src/main.py:25",
"error_message": "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'strip'"
}
}
}

5. Refactoring Guidance Promptโ€‹

Name: refactoring_guidance Description: Provide guidance for refactoring code with repository context

Arguments:

  • target_area (required): Area of code to refactor
  • refactoring_goal (optional): Goal of the refactoring (performance, maintainability, etc.)

Example Usage:

{
"method": "prompts/get",
"params": {
"name": "refactoring_guidance",
"arguments": {
"target_area": "src/data_processor.py",
"refactoring_goal": "improve performance"
}
}
}

Performance Characteristicsโ€‹

Current Performance Metricsโ€‹

  • Repository Scanning: Approximately 500-1000 files/second initial indexing
  • Parse Latency: < 10ยตs per line of code for most languages
  • File Change Response: < 100ms from change detection to graph update
  • Memory Usage: Typically < 1GB for repositories with up to 1M nodes
  • Query Response: < 500ms for most graph traversals

Optimization Featuresโ€‹

  • Parallel Processing: Concurrent file parsing and analysis
  • Incremental Updates: Only re-parse changed files and affected dependencies
  • Memory Efficiency: Optimized data structures and configurable memory limits
  • Connection Pooling: Efficient MCP client management

Client Integrationโ€‹

Supported MCP Clientsโ€‹

CodeCodePrism is designed to work seamlessly with major MCP clients:

  • โœ… Claude Desktop: Full resources, tools, and prompts support
  • โœ… Cursor: Tools integration for code analysis
  • โœ… VS Code GitHub Copilot: Complete MCP feature support
  • โœ… Cline: Tools and resources for autonomous coding
  • โœ… Continue: Comprehensive IDE integration

Integration Examplesโ€‹

With Claude Desktopโ€‹

{
"mcpServers": {
codeprism": {
"command": "codeprism-mcp",
"args": ["/path/to/repository"],
"env": {
"PRISM_LOG_LEVEL": "info"
}
}
}
}

With Cursorโ€‹

{
"mcp": {
"servers": [
{
"name": codeprism",
"command": ["codeprism-mcp", "."],
"capabilities": ["tools", "resources", "prompts"]
}
]
}
}

Security and Privacyโ€‹

Access Controlโ€‹

  • Repository Boundaries: Strict containment within specified repository paths
  • File System Permissions: Respects operating system access controls
  • No External Network: Pure local analysis, no data transmission
  • User Consent: Clear indication of file access and analysis scope

Data Protectionโ€‹

  • Local Processing: All analysis performed locally
  • No Data Persistence: Analysis results are ephemeral unless explicitly cached
  • Audit Logging: Configurable logging of all access and operations
  • Resource Limits: Configurable memory and processing limits

Usage with MCP Clientsโ€‹

Repository Configurationโ€‹

# Start CodeCodePrism MCP server with repository
codeprism-mcp /path/to/repository

# The MCP server is designed to be launched by MCP clients
# Not as a standalone command-line tool

Configuration Optionsโ€‹

# MCP server configuration is handled by the client
# See MCP client documentation for configuration options

Current Implementation Statusโ€‹

โœ… Production Ready (6 tools)โ€‹

  • Core navigation tools: repository_stats, trace_path, explain_symbol
  • Symbol analysis: find_dependencies, find_references, search_symbols

๐Ÿšง Beta Status (6 tools)โ€‹

  • Content tools: search_content, find_files, content_stats - Some parameter validation issues
  • Quality tools: analyze_complexity, find_duplicates - Basic functionality working
  • Architectural tools: detect_patterns - Pattern detection algorithms implemented

๐Ÿ”ฌ Alpha Status (6 tools)โ€‹

  • Advanced analysis: analyze_transitive_dependencies, trace_data_flow - Core algorithms implemented, needs refinement
  • Specialized analysis: find_unused_code, analyze_security, analyze_performance, analyze_api_surface - Framework in place, detection rules being refined

Testing Results Summaryโ€‹

  • Overall Success Rate: ~80% (16/18 tools passing in comprehensive testing)
  • Stable Tools: 6/18 tools fully reliable
  • Issues Identified: Parameter validation, large repository performance, some advanced algorithms need refinement

Known Issues & Limitationsโ€‹

Documentation & Content Analysisโ€‹

  • Limited .md file support: Primary focus on code files (JS/TS/Python)
  • Documentation parsing: Basic text search only, no semantic markdown analysis
  • Comment extraction: Limited context awareness for inline documentation

Performance & Scalabilityโ€‹

  • Large repository performance: Some tools may be slow on repositories >1M nodes
  • Memory usage: Can be intensive for complex architectural analysis
  • Incremental updates: Real-time file monitoring not fully implemented

Advanced Analysis Accuracyโ€‹

  • Pattern detection: May have false positives/negatives in complex codebases
  • Security analysis: Basic vulnerability patterns, not comprehensive audit-level detection
  • Performance analysis: Algorithmic analysis based on code patterns, not runtime profiling

Phase Development Statusโ€‹

โœ… Phase 1: Core Intelligence (Completed)โ€‹

  • Graph-first code analysis and navigation
  • Symbol resolution and relationship mapping
  • Context-enhanced tool responses
  • Multi-language parsing (Python, JavaScript/TypeScript)

๐Ÿšง Phase 2: Quality & Architecture (In Progress)โ€‹

  • Code complexity and quality metrics โœ…
  • Duplicate detection โœ…
  • Design pattern recognition ๐Ÿšง
  • Architectural dependency analysis ๐Ÿšง

๐Ÿ”ฌ Phase 3: Advanced Analytics (Early Stage)โ€‹

  • Data flow analysis ๐Ÿ”ฌ
  • Unused code detection ๐Ÿ”ฌ
  • Security vulnerability scanning ๐Ÿ”ฌ
  • Performance bottleneck identification ๐Ÿ”ฌ

๐Ÿ“‹ Phase 4: Enterprise Features (Planned)โ€‹

  • API surface analysis and versioning
  • Cross-language dependency linking
  • Plugin architecture for custom analyzers
  • Integration with external code quality tools

Conclusionโ€‹

The CodeCodePrism MCP server provides a comprehensive graph-first code intelligence solution through the Model Context Protocol. With 18 advanced tools across multiple development phases, it enables LLM applications to understand and navigate codebases through structured relationship data, advanced complexity analysis, and architectural intelligence.

Core Strengthsโ€‹

  • Graph-First Architecture: Superior relationship understanding compared to text-based tools
  • Context-Rich Analysis: All tools provide source code context with responses
  • Multi-Language Support: Robust Python and JavaScript/TypeScript parsing
  • Extensible Framework: Well-architected foundation for additional analysis capabilities
  • MCP Compliance: Full compatibility with major LLM development environments

Areas for Improvementโ€‹

  • Documentation Analysis: Enhanced support for markdown and documentation files
  • Tool Stability: Improving reliability of beta and alpha tools to production level
  • Performance Optimization: Better handling of large repositories and complex analysis
  • External Dependencies: Enhanced analysis of third-party library relationships

The server provides a solid foundation for AI-powered code intelligence with a comprehensive set of analysis tools. While some advanced features are still in development, the core functionality offers significant value for understanding and navigating codebases through structured relationship data.


This specification accurately describes the current implementation of CodeCodePrism's MCP server as of the latest testing. Tool stability and feature completeness vary by phase. For detailed tool-by-tool status and known issues, refer to the implementation testing documentation.